Shilpi Maheshwari vs. Emerald Court Owner Resident Welfare Association
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| P# | I.A.No.2/14 in SLP(C)11959/14 | 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XI | ITEM NO.2 | COURT NO.4 | SECTION | ||
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |||||
| I.A. 2/2014 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)<br>No(s).11959/2014 | |||||
| (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated<br>11/04/2014 in WP 65085/2012 passed by the HIGH COURT OF<br>JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) | |||||
| r(s) | SUPERTECH LTD. | Petitione | |||
| VERSUS | |||||
| s(s) | EMERALD COURT OWNER RESIDENT WE. ASS.& ORS. | Respondent | |||
| (For directions and Office Report) | |||||
| Date : 04/06/2014 This application was called on for hearing<br>today. | |||||
| CORAM : | |||||
| HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C NAGAPPAN<br>(VACATION BENCH) | |||||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr.V.Giri, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. R.Chandrachud, Adv.<br>Mr.Rajnish Singh, Adv. | ||||
| For Respondent(s)<br>For RR.No.1 | Ms.Bina Gupta, Adv. | ||||
| For RR No.3 | Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. | ||||
| Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. | |||||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |||||
| Issue notice to the respondents. | |||||
| Signature Not Verified<br>Learned counsel having entered appearance on behalf of | |||||
| Digitally signed by | |||||
| Satish Kumar Yadav<br>Date: 2014.06.04<br>16:37:49 IST | the<br>respondents | state | that<br>they | have<br>no<br>objection<br>t | |
| o<br>the<br>Reason: | |||||
| w of | acceptance of the prayer made in I.A.No.2 of 2014.<br>In vie | ||||
| ect | the | above, I.A.No. 2 of 2014 is | allowed as prayed for, subj | ||
| I.A.No.2/14 in SLP(C)11959/14 | 2 |
to the following conditions:
(i) The exercise of removal of articles from the premises in question shall begin on 06.06.2014 at 9.00 A.M. and continue upto 5.00 P.M. It will be open to respondent No.1 as also respondent No.3 to nominate two representatives each, to be present at the time of removal of the movable articles. (ii) The entire process of removal of articles, shall be carried out under the supervision of Mr.Aditya Si ngh, Advocate, who is appointed by us, at the joint request of the learned counsel for the rival parties, as Local Commissioner. The Local Commissioner shall draw an inventory of the articles removed from the premises on a daily basis. (iii) The process of removal of articles,
shall continue on the following two days during the same hours. In case, the entire process is not completed, the petitioner, with the permission of the Local Commissioner, can extend its activity of removal of articles by a further day.
(iv) The Local Commissioner shall be paid Rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) for every date. The said payment shall be made by the applicant-petitioner. The Loc al Commissioner shall submit a report of compliance, on the next date of hearing.
(v) Respondent No.3 shall de-seal and re-seal the premises in question for the implementation of the in stant order.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PHOOLAN WATI ARORA)
COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR