Union Of India Ministry Of Finance Through The Secretary vs. Srd Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Area Through Its Constituted Attorney And Authorised Signatory
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.9 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION III |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS<br>I.A. 3/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). | ||
| 11878/2015 | (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/11/2014<br>in WA No. 243/2009 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati) | |
| UNION OF INDIA & ORS. | Petitioner(s) | |
| VERSUS | ||
| M/S KAMAKHYA COSMETICS & PHARMACEUTICALS & ORS.<br>(for stay and office report) | Respondent(s) | |
| Date : 07/12/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. | ||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI<br>HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | |
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr.<br>Mukul Rohtagi, AG<br>Mr.<br>A.P. Mayee, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Rajiv Nanda, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Sreedhar Potaraju, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>B.K. Prasad, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s)<br>Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>ASHOK RAJ SINGH<br>Date: 2015.12.15<br>12:32:40 IST<br>Reason: | Mr. A.V. Manavalan, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, Adv.<br>Mr. Shantanu Tyagi, Adv.<br>Mr. S.S. Shroff, Adv.<br>Mr. Shriram P. Pingle, Adv.<br>Mr. Parthiv K. Goswami, Adv.<br>Ms. Diksha Rai, Adv.<br>Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv.<br>Mr. T.N.Durga Prasad, Adv.<br>Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra,Adv.<br>Mr. M. P. Devanath,Adv.<br>Mr. Satya Mitra,Adv. | |
| Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury, Adv.<br>Mr. K.J. Josh & Co. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
2
Heard.
Pending further orders, we direct that subject to the petitioners releasing 50% of the amount due to the respondent in terms of the impugned judgment on the respondents' furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional commissioner, the operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed.
We further direct that contempt proceedings initiated against the petitioners shall subject to their releasing 50% of the amount as stated above remain stayed.
The needful shall be done within four weeks from today.
I.A. No.3 of 2015 is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
(ASHOK RAJ SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) Court Master Court Master