Union Of India Ministry Of Finance Through The Secretary vs. Srd Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. Industrial Area Through Its Constituted Attorney And Authorised Signatory
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.20 | REGISTRAR COURT.2 | SECTION III |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A |
| BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS | ||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).28194-28201/2010 | ||
| UNION OF INDIA & ANR.ETC. | Petitioner(s) | |
| VERSUS | ||
| M/S V.V.F.LTD.ETC.ETC. | Respondent(s) | |
| (With appln(s) for stay,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer<br>for interim relief and office report )) | ||
| WITH SLP(C) NO. 15481-15489 of 2011<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 28966 of 2012<br>(With prayer for interim relief and office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 36926 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>Civil Appeal NO. 5487-5488 of 2011<br>(With office report) | ||
| Date: 14/03/2013<br>These Petitions were called on for hearing today. | ||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Manu T. Ramachandran,Adv.<br>Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. | |
| Mrs Anil Katiyar,Adv. | ||
| Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Vishal Gupta,Adv.<br>Mr. Kumar Mihir,Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Neha Agarwal,Adv.<br>Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. | |
| Mr. Praveen Kumar ,Adv | ||
| Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha ,Adv<br>Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. | 2/- | |
| Item No.20 | : 2 : | |
| Mr. Rajan Narain,Adv.<br>Mr. Avinash Mohapatra,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Kunal Chatterji,Adv.<br>Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Ajit Kumar Panda,Adv.<br>Mr. O.P. Sharma,Adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Advdd. |
Mr. Zangpo Sherpa,Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan,Adv.
Mrs. Aruna Mathur,Adv. M/s. Arputham Aruna & Co.,Advs.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C)No.28194-28199/2010 respondent No. 2 is still awaited. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps against the respective respondent No. 2 within four weeks as a last chance. In SLP(C)No.15481/2011 respondent No. 1 is awaited.
In SLP(C)No.36926/2012 the sole respondent is awaited it is submitted that the unserved respondents in both the cases is the petitioners in SLP(C)No.21622/2012. Hence, the respective petitioners in the above incomplete matters are directed to serve notice on the respective respondents on the Ld. counsel for the petitioners in SLP(C)No.21622/2012 to complete service.
In SLP(C)No.28966/2012 await return of notice of respondent No. 2 to 4.
List the matters on 6.5.2013.
| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) | |s | |Registrar |