Pankaj Kumar vs. The Union Territory Of Chandigarh Chief Secretary

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3970/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/07/2013 in CRLA No. 173/2009 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) MANVIR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH Respondent(s) <pre>(with office report)</pre> WITH SLP(Crl) No. 10288/2014 (With Office Report) SLP(Crl) No. 3600/2015 (With Office Report) Date: 13/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. $CORAM :$ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. $(SLP 3970/14)$ Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. Mr. M. P. Shorawala, Adv. $(SLP 10288/14)$ Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv. Ms. Srishti Govil, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. Ms. Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Adv. (SLP $3600/15$ ) Dr. (Mrs.) Laxmi Shastri, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Walia, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Adv. e Not Verified Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

At the joint request of counsel for the parties, post again

$\mathbf{1}$

SECTION TIB

COURT NO.2

TTEM NO. $40$

Heard.

after four weeks.

Learned counsel for the parties may in the mean time file a detailed chart indicating by reference to the evidence on record the role played by each one of the petitioners in the commission of the offence and any mitigating factors that may call for our interference with the sentence awarded to them.

(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER