The Comptroller And Auditor General Of India vs. B. N. Amaranarayana Swamy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
23 Jul 2016
Order Text
SECTION – XV
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.33259/2016 WITH 34997, 34998, 34999, 35000, 35001, 33512, 35002, 35004, 32992, 34996, 36450, 37709 & 36448 OF 2016 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF)
CHIEF COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANR. ETC. ETC. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
RAM LAKHAN MEENA ETC.ETC. RESPONDENTS
COMMON OFFICE REPORT
The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 21.11.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with S.L.P. (C) No. 21803 of 2014 and other connected matters."
SLP(C) NOS. 33259, 34997, 34998, 34999, 33512, 35000, 34996, 35002, 36450 & 36448 /2016
It is submitted that accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the sole respondent in all the above-mentioned matters through registered AD post. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of sole respondent but counter affidavit has not been filed so far.
Service is complete in all the above-mentioned matters.
SLP (C) NO. 35001/2016
It is submitted that accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the three respondents. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. As per track report shows that "Item Delivered" at New Delhi, GPO in respect of respondent No. 2 and "Item Delivered" at Bikaner, H.O. in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 so far. Neither AD card nor unserved cover has been received in respect of respondent No. 2 so far.
Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 2.
SLP (C) NO. 35004/2016
It is submitted that accordingly, show cause notice was issued to both the respondents. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. As per track report shows that "Item Delivered" at New Delhi, GPO in respect of respondent No. 2.
Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 2.
SLP (C) NO. 32992/2016
It is submitted that pursuant Court's Order dated 07.11.2016, show cause notice was issued to all the three respondents. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. As per track report shows that "Item Delivered" at New Delhi, GPO in respect of respondent No. 2 and "Item Delivered" at Bikaner, H.O. in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 so far. Neither AD card nor unserved cover has been received in respect of respondent No. 2 so far.
Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 2.
SLP (C) NOS. 37709/2016
It is submitted that pursuant Court's Order dated 16.12.2016, show cause notice was issued to all the three respondents. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but counter affidavit has not been filed so far. As per track report shows that "Item Delivered" at Rajasthan Secretariat in respect of respondent No. 2 and AD card duly signed has been received in respect of respondent No. 3 but no one has entered appearance on behalf of them so far.
Service is complete.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
Dated this the 10th day of February, 2017.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: Mr. B. K. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, A Adv.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
2/db/or
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order