S. Udaya Shankar vs. State Of Karnataka And Ors Etc. Etc

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:19 Aug 2013
CNR:SCIN010221552013

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

19 Aug 2013

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

\234 ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 13874-13875/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 26/04/2013 in WP No.46250/2004,WA No.1244/2009, WA No.1245/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE) A. UDAYA SHANKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14437-14438 of 2013 (With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and office report) S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 14442-14443 of 2013 (With appln(s) for permission to file SLP office report) Date: 19/08/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basava Prabhu S Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajeshwara, Adv. Mr. Rajendra M.S., Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. K.Vijay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioners are permitted to file the special leave petitions. Delay condoned. Leave granted. Issue notice on the appellants' prayer for interim relief, returnable in eight weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. In the meanwhile, status quo regarding possession of the property in question, as it is obtaining today, shall be maintained by both the parties. This would necessarily mean that neither party shall change the present character of the property in question nor alienate the same to any other person in any capacity whatsoever. It shall be the appellant's duty to serve the respondents before the next date of hearing failing which the interim order passed today shall stand automatically vacated.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(30) - 7 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 28 Jul 2022

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 28 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 15 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 14 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 8 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 13 Aug 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 9 Feb 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 2 Feb 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 8 Mar 2018

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 12 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 14 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 11 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 11 Aug 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 27 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 27 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 1 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 15 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 15 Jan 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 28 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 28 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 8 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 8 Oct 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 25 Jul 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 27 Sept 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 19 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 12 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view