Muhammad Sabir K. T vs. Jaseela P

ITEM NO.21

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION XI-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2023 in WA No.1620/2022 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)

NAJMA T P & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

JASEELA P. & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.188439/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ FILING and $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{I}$ No.188441/2023-ADDITION/DELETION/MODIFICATION PARTIES and IA No.188440/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.188438/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION $(SLP/TP/WP/..)$

Date: 22-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Shinoj K.naravanan, Adv. Ms. Niveditha R.menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

The application for permission to file the Special Leave 1. Petition is allowed.

$\mathbf{2}$ Delav condoned.

3. The application for deleting the names of respondent Nos.12 to 69 is allowed at the risk and responsibility of the Signatu<del>re Not</del> Verifie Digital Property vertical distance of the property of the property of the property. umar yad:<br> $\frac{1}{2}$

Cause-title be amended accordingly.

Issue notice. $5.$

16:56:04 IST<br>Reaso

6. Tag with SLP(C)No.9566/2023. 7. Meanwhile, the petitioners, who are provisionally appointed teachers may not be relieved, provided that there are sufficient vacancies for appointment of specially-abled candidates. 8. It goes without saying that the directions issued earlier to complete the process of appointment of specially-abled candidates shall continue without disturbing the appointment of the petitioners.

9. List on 30.10.2023.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)