Jayanti Kumar vs. Prasant Kumar Raut

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

SECTION X<u>VIA</u> $18 - 01 - 16$ REGISTRAR COURT: ITEM No.

.....Respondent

<u>TITION (CIVIL) NO. [MI] OF 201.</u>

....Petitioner

Tayanti Kumovs<br>Pousant Kumovs Raut

OFFICE REPORT

VERSUS

The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court / Ld. Registrar Court on $1.6-11$ , 201 Swhen the Court / he was granted / directed.

Service seport of the sole sespondent is awaited. List again on 18.1.2012.

$1.23$ $NOT$ READY / FOR THE REASON:

Accordingly, Nolice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on $\frac{1}{10}$ as well as Dasti / Through Trial Court.

$\cdot 2$ It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks," $__$

It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received-34. back from sole respondent so far.

It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been. received but no one has filed Vakalamama and memo of appearance on his behalf. so far.

It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating $\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{F}$ therein that

$6$ The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasti service on the Respondent No. / has not filed Affidavit of service of dash notice.

$\frac{1}{1}$ SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE.

The matter (s) is / gre listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report.

Dated this the 14 day of January ²⁰¹g,

<u>Copy to</u>: $M_{\delta}$ , Subhra Sanyal, Advocate Advocate

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ASSISTANTREGISTRAR