Manish Khandelwal vs. Maharashtra State Police Complaint Authority

ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10711/2023

MANISH KHANDELWAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MAHARASHTRA STATE POLICE COMPLAINT AUTHORITY & ORS.Respondent(s)

(IA No.162093/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.162098/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.162101/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.162094/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.162099/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IA No.162096/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

Date : 04-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Iyer Shruti Gopal, AOR Mr. Anandh K., Adv. Ms. Nishita Jagetia, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Yuvraj Gaikwad, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Raavi Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Respondent Nos.2 and 12 are granted four weeks' time for Reason:

filing counter affidavit.

contd….

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of the unserved respondent Nos.8 and 9.

Respondent No.10 has refused to accept notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Abhishek Thakral, appearing on behalf of M/s Parekh & Co., Advocate-onrecord appears for respondent No.10 and seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks.

Respondent No.11 has refused to accept notice, as such, service is deemed to be complete, however, none has entered appearance.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.

List again on 23.01.2024.

H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar