Sagar vs. State Of U P

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s).21949/2025

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-01-2025 in CRMBA No.44876/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]

SAGAR

PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF U P & ANR.

$$

IA No. 121310/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 121307/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 121304/2025 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)

Diary No.21963/2025

Date: 16-05-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. Praveen Swarup, AOR Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv. Mr. Devesh Maurya, Adv. Mr. Dilip Kumar Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Virender Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 03-01-2025 $1.$ in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.44876/2024 [titled Signal diagram with the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sign of the sig T7.41.91 - 12-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.46196/2024 [titled "Prince vs. State of Uttar Pradesh"] passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.

2. Permission to file the present Special Leave Petitions are granted.

3. Delay condoned.

4. Issue notice, returnable on 04.08.2025.

5. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Let steps for service be taken within two weeks.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the learned standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh.

7. In the notice itself let it be mentioned that the respondents are required to file the counter affidavit before the next date of listing.

(D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)