Pbs Foods(Sugars) P. Ltd. Mr. Prabhat Kumar Jharepresentative/ Manager vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. Sugar Industry And Acne Development Thr. Principal Secretary

^ ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10134/2012 EAST U.P.SUGAR MILLS ASSN.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 25696/2012 (With Office report) Date : 08/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Neha Agarwal,adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mrs. Priya Puri,Adv. Mr. Deeptakirti Verma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Caveator-in-person,Adv. Mr.Kunal Verma,adv. Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr.Galav Sharma,adv. M/s. Parekh & Co.,Adv. Mr.Chetan Chawla,adv. Ms.Anil Katiyar,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.10134/2012 What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although by order dated 25.07.2014 of this Court, six weeks Signature Not Verified time as last chance was given to the respondent Nos. 1-3 & 4 to Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.10.10 16:07:55 IST Reason: file the counter affidavit,yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to ..........2 ITEM NO.25 -2-

them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

SLP(C) No.25696/2012

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.16, 18, 26, 28, 29, 31 and 35 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The office report further is that although by order dated 25.07.2014 of this Court six weeks time as last chance was given to the respondent Nos.1-3 to file the counter affidavit, yet they have not done the needful so far. Therefore, no further opportunity is warranted to be given to them on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB