Jhs Svendgaard Laboratories Ltd vs. Shantanu Maharaj Khosla

ITEM NO.32+40 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP No(s). 14569-14571/2014

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31/05/2014 in CRMMO No. 4099/2013, CRMMO No. 4105/2013,CRMMO No. 4098/2013 passed by the High Court Of H.P. At Shimla)

M/S. JHS SVENDGAARD LABORATORIES LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SHANTANU MAHARAJ KHOSLA & ORS. Respondent(s)

CRLMP. 14569-14571/2014(with permission to file SLP and office report) WITH SLP(Crl)...CRLMP Nos. 187-189/2015 (With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)

Date : 09/01/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harin Raval, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Mr. Yash Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nirmal Goenka, Adv. Mr. Shashwat Tripathy, Adv. Ms. Nidhi jaswal, Adv. Mr. Ananto Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, AAG Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. H.N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Samarjeet Patnaik, Adv. Mr. Rohan Garg, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Gaur, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv. Digitally signed by Usha Rani Bhardwaj Date: 2015.01.10 12:55:47 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Taranam Cheema, Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Samarjeet Patnaik, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Gaur, Adv. Mr. Rohan Garg, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice to the unserved respondents returnable within six weeks.

Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja accepts notice on behalf of Shantanu Maharaj Khosla and Ms. Preeti Bishnoi.

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel submits that there has been vital suppression of facts inasmuch as events, which have followed after 26.03.2010 and before 17.06.2013, have not been mentioned by the complainant.

Parties are granted liberty to file counter or documents, if any, before the next date of hearing.

2