Naman Kuriyal vs. Yasmoon Akhtar Siddiqui

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:7 Jun 2018
CNR:SCIN010215142018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).15100-15101/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-05-2018 in SA No. 403/2018 30-05-2018 in SA No. 404/2018 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital)

MALVIKA & ORS.ETC. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

YASHMOON AKHTAR SIDDIQUI & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)

(I.A. No.81707 of 2018 – Application for exemption to file O.T.)

WITH Diary No(s). 21514/2018 (X) (FOR impleading party ON IA 81291/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 81291/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 81362/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 81364/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 81365/2018)

Date : 07-06-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Parthsakha Datta,Sr.Adv.
(SLP 15100-101/18)Mr. S.K. Agarwal,Adv.
Mr. Subhash Chandra,Adv.
Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR
(D.No.21514/2018)Mr. U.K. Unniyal,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.
Mr. Dhananjay Garg, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Aftab Rasheed,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard.

Signature Not Verified

SLP(C)NO.15100-15101/2018 :

We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order(s). The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed. Digitally signed by DEEPAK MANSUKHANI Date: 2018.06.07 15:39:41 IST Reason:

Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

SLP(C) Diary No.21514 of 2018 :

The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Since it is stated at Bar that the petitioner was not a party before the High Court, if it is so, the petitioner is at liberty to move the High Court in accordance with law.

It is made clear that we have not examined the merits of the case.

(MAHABIR SINGH) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER