State Of Up vs. Raghvendra Prasad Pandey

SLP [C] NO.13023/2023

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.2 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13023/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-03-2023 in SAD No. 103/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)

STATE OF UP & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAGHVENDRA PRASAD PANDEY & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.118078/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) IA NO.132658/2023- FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA NO.133777/2023-PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON

Date : 17-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

	For Petitioner(s)	Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.
		Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR
		Ms. Anuradha, Adv.

• For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Deepeika Kalia, Adv. Mr. Keshav Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Sarthi, Adv.

  • Mr. Ankit Mishra, Adv.
  • Mr. Animesh Tripathi, Adv.
  • Mr. Shantanu Krishna, AOR

• Mr. Krishna Madhav, Caveator-in-person

  • Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, AOR

• Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shariq Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Tariq Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Abhik Chimni, Adv. Mr. Omar Hoda, Adv.
  • M/S. Ahmadi Law Offices, AOR

SLP [C] NO.13023/2023

Mr. Syed Imtiyaz Ali, Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Mumtaz Alam Siddiqui, Adv. Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv. Ms. Sheetal Rawat, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Kanva, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Application for impleadment is rejected.

The impugned judgment dated 03.03.2023 takes care of the interest of the petitioner in the following terms:

"Thus, continuance of the respondentspetitioners on adhoc capacity is subject to their consideration for substantive appointment in terms of Section 33G and further that they shall cease to remain adhoc appointees from such date as the State Government may provide. The appellants-State authorities shall thus undertake the aforesaid exercise as envisaged under Section 33G in respect of all the respondentspetitioners and conclude the same, as expeditiously as possible."

We really don't see why they should have come to this Court in view of the aforesaid liberty granted SLP [C] NO.13023/2023

and it is for the petitioner to examine the case under the relevant statutory provision.

The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR CUM PS COURT MASTER (NSH)