The State Of Punjab vs. Union Of India

REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION XVII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY

Original Suit (s). No(s). 2/2011

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

(0.S NO. 2 OF 2011 IS LISTED FOR EVIDENCE BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR SH. H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY AT 12 NOON (ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 1 OF 2011 WILL BE LISTED WITH O.S. NO. 2/2011 SEPARATELY, BUT IN SEQUENCE AS PER HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 9.03.2018 IN O.S NO. 1 OF 2011) )

Date: 22-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

• For Petitioner(s) Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Ms. Awantika Manohar, Adv. Mr. Aashish Arora, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. D. K. Devesh, AOR
• For Respondent(s) Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Vinay K. Shailendra, Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Sakshem Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharma, AOR
  • Mr. Wasim A. Quadri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mr. Chintan Singhal, Adv.
  • UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

is fixed for further cross-examination of Todav it Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1).

ITEM NO.51

Respondent $(s)$

Mr. Jagmohan Singh Mann (DW-1) is present.

Learned counsel for both the parties are present.

DW-1 is further cross-examined by learned counsel for Defendant No.4 – State of Haryana. The statement of DW-1 has been recorded in question and answer form in the presence of learned counsel for both the parties, from Question Nos. 15-29.

At this stage learned counsel for Defendant No.4 makes a request to defer further cross-examination of DW-1.

For further cross-examination, call on 23.11.2023 at 2.30 P.M.

H. SHASHIDHARA SHETTY Registrar