Syndicate Bank Thr. General Manager vs. D Sreenivasa Murthi

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 5525/2012 BANK OF BARODA & ANR Appellant(s) VERSUS G.PALANI & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 07/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Prashant Mehra,Adv. Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Jha,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. M/s Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv. Ms. Naresh Bakshi,Adv. Mr. Abhishek,Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the Ld. Counsel for the appellants and the Ld. Counsel for the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by Signature Not Verified letter dated 14.7.2014 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2015.04.08 12:58:27 CEST Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not Reason: file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted Item No.98 2 the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent who has entered appearance does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub

Z Item No.98 1

Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. Therefore, in view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

MG