Uoi & Others vs. Roshni Devi

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 8587/2014

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

NIHAL SINGH Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and office report)

Date : 08/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

10:48:34 IST Reason:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s) Mr. P.S.Patalia, ASG, MS. B.Sunita Rao, Adv Mr. Anurag, Adv. Mr. N.Vinayak, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 302 days in the filing of this application for grant of leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the application for us to condone the same.

The prayer for condonation is accordingly declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.

(SHASHI SAREEN) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER Digitally signed by (Signed order is placed on the file) Shashi Sareen Date: 2015.05.12 Signature Not Verified

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. D 8587 OF 2014

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Appellant(s)

Versus

NIHAL SINGH ... Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 302 days in the filing of this application for grant of leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the application for us to condone the same.

The prayer for condonation is accordingly declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.

.................J. (T.S.THAKUR)

...................J. (R.BANUMATHI)

New Delhi, May 08, 2015.