Sujith N. P vs. K. J. Varghese

ITEM NO.10

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION XI-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2023 in WA No.1620/2022 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)

ALEN JOY & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

JASEELA P & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

No. 223693/2023-CONDONATION $OF$ DELAY FILING and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ $(IA)$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ No.223697/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT No. 223699/2023-EXEMPTION FROM $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{A}$ FTI TNG $0. T$ $TA$ No.223695/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date: 20-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Bijo M.Joy, Adv. Mr. Pranav Krishna, Adv. Ms. Niveditha R.menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 1.

$2.$ The application for permission to file the Special Leave Petition is allowed.

3. Delav condoned.

$\Delta$ . Issue notice, returnable on 02.01.2024.

Tag with $SLP(C)$ No.9566/2023 and other connected matters. 5<br>The Not Verified

Meanwhile, the petitioners, who $are$ provisionally $\overline{\mathbf{a}}$ pointed teachers may not be relieved, provided that there are sufficient vacancies for appointment of specially-abled candidates, as directed in SLP(C)No.9566/2023.

7. It goes without saying that the directions issued earlier to complete the process of appointment of specially-abled candidates shall continue without disturbing the appointment of the petitioners.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)