Adarsh P vs. K. J. Varghese

COURT NO.5

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)............ Diary No(s).46747/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2023 in WA No. 1459/2022 13-03-2023 in WA No. 1620/2022 13-03-2023 in WA No. 1632/2022 13-03-2023 in WA No.1644/2022 13-03-2023 in $WA$ No.1668/2022 13-03-2023 in WA No.1680/2022 13-03-2023 $\mathbf{in}$ $WA$ 13-03-2023 in No.1682/2022 $\mathsf{W}\mathsf{A}$ No.1721/2022 13-03-2023 in $WA$ No.1763/2022 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)

FATHIMATHUL FASEELA & ORS. ETC.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MUHAMMAD SUFIYAN V. & ORS. ETC.

Respondent $(s)$

No.252508/2023-CONDONATION FTI TNG $(IA)$ $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY $IN$ $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $TA$ No.252509/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and No.252510/2023-EXEMPTION FROM $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ FILING $0.T.$ and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.253756/2023-DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT)

Item No.46

Diary No(s).49663/2023

$$ No.257524/2023-CONDONATION $\mathsf{OF}$ DELAY $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $TA$ No.257525/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT No.257526/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ $0.T.$ and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.257523/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..), $TA$ No.259902/2023-DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT)

Date: 13-12-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bijo M. Joy, Adv. Mr. Shinoj K.narayanan, Adv. Ms. Niveditha R.menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv. Mr. Pranav Krishna, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The applications (IA No.253756/2023 & IA No.259902/2023) for 1.

deleting the names of respondents are allowed at the risk and responsibility of the petitioner.

2. Cause-title be amended accordingly.

3. Permission to file special leave petition is granted.

4. Delay condoned.

5. Issue notice.

6. Tag with SLP(C)No.9566 of 2023.

7. Meanwhile, the petitioners, who are provisionally appointed teachers, may not be relieved, provided that there are sufficient vacancies for the appointment of specially-abled candidates.

8. It goes without saying that the directions issued earlier to complete the process of appointment of specially-abled candidates shall continue without disturbing the appointment of the petitioners.

(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)