The Assistant General Manager (Recruitment) Office Of The Chief General Manager vs. Premarajan C. V

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 9322/2012 B.S.N.L. AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHOKAN T.U. AND ORS $Respondent(s)$ (with office report) WTTH C.A. No. 9203/2012 (With Office Report) Date: 27/11/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms.Paromita Majumdar, adv. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sureshan P., Adv.

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

ITEM NO.94

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

The office report is that the appellant and the respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by notices dated 31.05.13 & 13.08.2013 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of Signal were Not yes with seeking special Signal were seeking special leave to $\frac{1}{2}$ file any further statement of case. The order further provides

$\dots \dots \dots \dots 2$

SECTION XIA

that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

In view of the rule position cited above, both the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB