Sulakshana Relhan vs. Jvg Fin. Ltd Company In Liquidation Through Official Liquidator
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Jul 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XIV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20960/2013 LT. COL. RPS DHANOA (RTD.) & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JVG FINANCE LTD. & ORS.
(with appln. (s) for application for transposition and interim <pre>relief and office report)</pre>
WITH SLP(C) No. $26294/2013$ (With appln.(s) for Office Report)
Date: 25/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
| For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi, Adv.<br>Mr. H. K. Chaturvedi ,Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. M.K. Ghosh, Adv.<br>Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr.Ravindra Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
SLP(C) No. $20960/2013$
What gets revealed from the perusal of the Office Report is that although by Order dated 2.5.2014 of this Court the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 was given six weeks time as last atur<mark>e No</mark>t Verifie nce for filing the counter affidavit, yet he has not done the $G$ 16.57 WING edful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be
$. .2/-$
$Respondent(s)$
given to him on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Service is complete as against the respondent Nos. 3,5,6,10,11, 13, 16 and 18 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
The office report further states that respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4, 11, 12,13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 have expressed their inability to engage the services of an Advocate. Therefore, the matter shall be placed before the Supreme Court Legal Aid Services Committee for accord of consideration to their request and on the strength of the rules. The served respondents other than these shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.
Two weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No. 7. The office report further is that the application for transposition of respondent Nos. 8 and 9 as petitioner Nos. 44 and 45 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners has been registered and noted for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. List and await orders.
SLP(C) No. 26294/2013
What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that although two opportunities have already been given to the respondent No. 1 for filing the counter affidavit, yet he has not done the needful so far. Therefore no further opportunity is warranted to be given to him on that count taking into consideration the rule position. Service is reported to be complete as against the other respondents. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules, if and when the connected ones gets ready for listing.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
MG