Ambika Rajagopal Padaki vs. Seetharam

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24268-24300/2017

SMT SHARDA SHANKAR & ORS

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SEETHARAM & ORS.

$(FOR)$

Respondent $(s)$

WITH Diary No(s). 14652/2017 (IV-A) ( FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 39556/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 39557/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 44733/2018) Diary No(s). 16109/2017 (IV-A) (Office-Report FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33336/2018) Diary No(s). $16710/2017$ (IV-A) (FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 39610/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 39613/2018) SLP(C) No. 16948-16979/2017 (IV-A) (and FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 5945/2018 FOR [IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENT] ON IA 5948/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5949/2018) SLP(C) No. 16745/2017 (IV-A) SLP(C) No. 21897-21928/2017 (IV-A) (FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 39543/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 39544/2018) Signature Not Verified $\begin{bmatrix}\n0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 &$ Reaso ( $\mathbb{R}^{\text{OS}}$ ) SLP(C) No. 26722-26753/2017 (IV-A)

$\mathbf{1}$

ITEM NO.95 2 SLP(C) No. 24455-24457/2017 (IV-A) (FOR) SLP(C) No. 22580-22582/2017 (IV-A) (FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 8543/2018) SLP(C) No. 24450-24452/2017 (IV-A) (FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33384/2018) SLP(C) No. 26720/2017 (IV-A) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 39574/2018) SLP(C) No. 19964/2017 (IV-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 36212-36213/2017 (IV-A) (FOR) SLP(C) No. 36207-36209/2017 (IV-A) (FOR) SLP(C) No. 36854-36886/2017 (IV-A) (IA) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1912/2018 in SLP(C) No. 26720/2017 (IV-A) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 24-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli,Adv. Mr. Dharm Singh,Adv. Mr. Nanda Kumar K.B.,Adv. M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, AOR Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi,Adv.

Mr. Priyank Jain,Adv.

Mr. Anup Jain, AOR Mr. Ananthu Suresh,Adv. Mr. Rohit Prasad,Adv. Mr. Nishanth Patil,Adv.

Mr. Mahesh Thakur, AOR

Mr. B.S. Ssrinivas,Adv. Ms. Vipasha Singh,Adv. Mr. Ashok Bannidinni,Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, AOR Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy,Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.S. Hegde,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR Mr. Mahesh Thakur, AOR Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy,Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR Mr. NOB Raju,Adv. Ms. Bharathi Raju,Adv. Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. Krutin R. Joshi,Adv. Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, AOR Ms. Usha Reddy,Adv. Mr. B. Rajesh,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Four weeks' time, as a last chance is given to appearing respondents in Diary No. 16109/2017,SLP(C) Nos. 24450-24452 and 24455-24457/2017 to learned counsel for respondents to file counter affidavit.

Learned counsel for petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.12 in SLP(C) Nos. 36207-36209, D.No.16109/2017 and SLP(C) Nos. 24455-24457/2017. Registry has pointed out defects in the said application. Learned counsel for petitioners shall, within a period of four weeks', rectify all such defects.

Ld. Counsel for petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file dasti proof in respect of other unserved respondents.

At this stage, Ld. Counsel appearing for the parties pointed out that all the respondents have already been served. According to them, 3-4 respondents namely Shri Satish Krishna Murthy in SLP(C) No. 19964/2017, Shri S.R. Gurumurthy and Ms. Neet H.S. in SLP (C) No. 36854/2017 remain to be served and have also been served in the connected matters. Therefore, the service is deemed complete on these respondents in all the matters.

Registry to verify the same and report accordingly.

Ms. Usha Reddy, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 11 in SLP(C) 16745/2017. She seeks and is given two weeks' time to file vakalatnama and four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

Mr. B. Rajesh, Ld. Counsel for respondent in SLP(C) Nos. 16948-16979/2017 submits that Respondent No.29(Nagamma) is expired. Ld. Counsel for petitioner is directed to take appropriate steps within a period of four weeks.

List again on 12.3.2019.

RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

MG