Chandigarh Housing Board Chairman vs. Mathura Prashad
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
24 Apr 2009
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
: ITEM NO.107 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 1974-1975/2012 CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD & ANR. Appellant(s ) VERSUS DEEPAK RAWAT & ORS. Respondent( s) Date : 26/11/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Ambreen Rasool,Adv. Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Sukhdev Sharma,Adv. Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that the appellants have file d the statement of case and the respondents have failed to file the same although they were notified to do so by notice dated 14.5.2013 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,201 3 provides that where the respondent has entered appearance and he does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2014.11.28 10:28:54 IST Reason: (M K HANJURA ) Registrar MG