Chandigarh Housing Board Chairman vs. Mathura Prashad

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19178-19179/2009 CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEEPAK RAWAT & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interim relief ) Date: 22/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Miss Ambreen Rasool, Adv. Mrs.Rachana Joshi Issar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner present. The ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 8,12,15,16,30,31,33 and 34 present and makes a statement that he has already filed vakalatnama. Office report says that respondent Nos. 28 and 29 are served by dasti. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted three weeks' time to file dasti proof of service on respondent No.26. At this stage the ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that they have already filed application for -2-

\220ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB

Item No.12

substituted service on respondent No.26. Office to verify the same and submit.

Since there are 36 respondents, office report is not

clear and incomplete regarding service position of all those respondents. Office is directed to prepare and submit a clear office report giving the service position of each of the respondents.

List again on 30.11.2011.

(H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRAR

hj