Punjab And Sind Bank Through Its Senior Manager vs. Hari Singh Madan

öITEM NO.54 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23345/2011

PUNJAB & SIND BANK Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HARI SINGH MADAN & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)

Date: 13/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr Kanwaljit Singh, Adv. Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Advocate who is present for respondent No.5 has pointed out that petitioner is intentionally not taking steps in confirming service upon unserved respondents. It has also been pointed out that in fact respondent No.4 has expired long back and though such fact is disclosed before the appellate tribunal, petitioner is not disclosing such fact and that some of the respondents are not residing in India and therefore, notices could not be served upon such respondents. If petitioner fails to take appropriate steps to confirm service upon unserved respondents by selecting appropriate mode or service as per law on or before 18.1.2012, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for nonprosecution. (S.G.SHAH) REGISTRAR

hj