Noida Golf Course Society vs. Vikrant Tongad
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [24-01-2022]
Listed On:
30 Nov 2021
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH
Civil Appeal No(s). 3074/2020
M/S ADVANT NAVIS BUSINESS PARK Appellant(s)
VERSUS
MAHESH CHANDRA SAXENA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 5722/2021 (XVII) ( IA No.117192/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.117195/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 30-11-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
- Mr. Vishnu Sharma, AOR
- Ms. Anupama Sharma, Adv.
- Mr. Amar Jyoti Sharma, Adv.
- Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv.
- Mr. Mayank Pandey, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Indira Kandra, Adv. Ms. Indra Bhakhar, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Kumar, AOR Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 3074/2020
Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 to 3 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent No.5. Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2021.12.03 11:13:19 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
contd…..
C.A. No. 5722/2021
Service is complete on respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 7 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.
Ld. counsel appearing for respondent No.2/Union of India prays for and is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
Ld. counsel appearing for respondent No.5 prays for and is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
Notice upon respondent No.6 was sent by registered post/speed post and the postal track report indicates that the item has been returned as 'Refused'. As such, service shall be deemed to be good service upon respondent No.6; however, none has entered appearance on behalf of the said respondent.
List on 24.1.2022.
AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar