Guwahati Carbon Ltd. Thru Its Director vs. Union Of India Thru The Commissioner Of Central Excise Shillong Meghalaya

ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION III

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA

Civil Appeal No(s). 4292-4319/2013

M/S BBF INDUSTRIES LTD.

Appellant(s) $A$

Respondent(s)

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAMMU

(with office report)

WTTH C.A. No. 4321-4322/2013 (With Office Report)

Date: 01/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr. M. P. Devanath, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that although the learned counsel representing the sole respondent has filed the counter affidavit yet he has not filed the vakalatnama so far. Therefore, the Counter Affidavit filed by him is taken off the record. Service of notice is complete on the respondent. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

ture Not Verified

(M K HANJURA) Registrar