Commissioner Of Customs vs. Bharti Airtel Limited Managing Director
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Before:
Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari
Stage:
Indirect Taxes Matters : Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.
Remarks:
Not taken up/ Not Today
Listed On:
3 May 2020
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.1 | Court 5 (Video Conferencing) | SECTION IX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | O F | I N D I A | ||
| Civil Appeal | No(s). | 4831/2009 | |||
| COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) MUMBAI<br>Appellant(s) | |||||
| VERSUS | |||||
| M/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWNS<br>AS KASCEL LIMITED) | Respondent(s) | ||||
| ([ ONLY I.A.NO.109166/2020 IN C.A.NO.5860/2019 IS TO BE<br>LISTED ) | |||||
| WITH<br>C.A. No. 5860/2019 (XVII-A)<br>(IA No. 109166/2020 - EX-PARTE STAY) | |||||
| Date : 04-11-2020 This matter was called on for hearing today. | |||||
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||||
| For Appellant(s) | MR. V. Lakshmikumaran, ADV.<br>MR. Rachit Jain, Adv.<br>MR. Anurag Kapoor, Adv.<br>Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Adv.<br>Ms. Runjhun Pare, ADV.<br>Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv.<br>Ms. Mounica Kasturi, Adv.<br>Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR | ||||
| Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR | |||||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr.Vikramjit Banerjee, Ld.ASG<br>Mr. K. Radhakrishna, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.Zoheb Hussain, Adv<br>Mr.Akshay Amritanshu, Adv<br>Ms.Shirin Khajuria, Adv<br>Mr.BK Prasad, AOR | ||||
| Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR | |||||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R |
IA No. 109166/2020 in C.A. No. 5860/2019
Counsel for the applicant/appellant submits that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry vs. ACER India Ltd., reported in 2004 (8) SCC 173.
Counsel for the respondent prays for time to examine that position.
List on 17.11.2020.
No coercive steps be taken till the next date of hearing.
(CHARANJEET KAUR) (VIRENDER SINGH) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER