The State Of Nagaland vs. S. Litingla Sangtam
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [25-09-2023]
Listed On:
8 Apr 2023
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.27 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19524/2022 THE STATE OF NAGALAND & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMOS SEB & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 04-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, AOR Ms. Ritu Chiudhary, Adv. Mr. Shivanker Beher, Adv.
Mr. Ankit Acharya, AOR
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Yashashika Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Two weeks time, is granted as a last chance to Ld. counsel for petitioner to file affidavit with proof of dasti service in respect
of respondent nos.164, 254 and 262 or to take fresh steps. Despite due service on respondent nos.200, 201, 364 and 428, there is no appearance and service is not complete on respondent no.199. However, Mr. Ankit Acharya, Ld. Counsel submits that Digitally signed by PRIYANKA MALIK Date: 2023.08.05 12:12:23 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos.163, 173, 199, 200, 201 and 428 has already been filed. Registry to verify. If so filed, four weeks time, is granted to said respondents to file counter affidavit.
As per office report, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos.2, 26, 133, 163, 173, 212, 275, 286, 288, 412, 416 and 420 but vakalatnama has not been filed. However, Ms. Ritu, Ld. Counsel submits that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos.26, 133, 212, 286, 288, 412, 416 and 420 has already been filed. Registry to verify.
Ms. Yashasvika Sharma, Ld. Counsel submits that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos.436 and 437 has already been filed. Registry to verify. If so filed, four weeks time, is granted to said respondents to file counter affidavit.
As per office report, Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent nos.27, 88 and 364 is defective. However, Ld. Counsel appearing for said respondents submits that defects have been cured. Registry to verify.
List again on 25.09.2023.
VIVEK SAXENA Registrar