The State Of Nagaland vs. S. Litingla Sangtam

ITEM NO.39 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PUNEET SEHGAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19524/2022 THE STATE OF NAGALAND & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

AMOS SEB & ORS.

Respondent(s)

Date: 10-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Miss Pratiksha Sharma, AOR Mr. Mueed Shah, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Acharva, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following ORDER

All the duly represented respondents have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted. However, ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the said respondents seeks time. Two weeks is granted as last and final opportunity. nico process as per 🎌 🎌 🎌 🎌 🏂 🎌 🎌 🎌 🎌 🎌 🎌 🎌 des else further opportunity stands declined.

Contd...

Item no.39

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of dasti service in respect of all unserved respondents despite last opportunity having been granted. However, ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks fresh dasti notice in respect of 41 unserved respondents. Dasti is allowed.

List again on 16.5.2023.

PUNEET SEHGAL Registrar