Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission vs. Lafarge India Pvt Ltd

Court:Supreme Court of India

Judge:Hon'ble M.Y. Eqbal

Case Status:Disposed

Order Date:28 Sept 2015

CNR:SCIN010206452015

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Get a certified copy of this order

Â	ITEM NO.6		COURT NO.10	SECTION XVII
		S U P R E M E C O U R T O F	RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS	I N D I A
	I.A. 2-3/2015 in Civil Appeal		No(s).	5336-5337/2015
	CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAppellant(s)
			VERSUS
	LAFARGE INDIA PVT LTD AND ANR.			Respondent(s)
		(for clarification/modification of court's order and office report)
	Date : 28/09/2015 These applications were called on for hearing<br>today.
	CORAM :
		HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN
	For Appellant(s)	Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.	Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr.Adv.<br>C. K. Rai,Adv.<br>Paramhans, Adv.<br>Neha, Adv.
	For Respondent(s)	Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv.<br>For M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv.
	UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R
	These applications are disposed of in terms of the<br>signed order.
		[INDU POKHRIYAL]<br>COURT MASTER		[SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR]<br>A.R.-CUM-P.S.
		(Signed order is placed on the file)
	Signature Not Verified
Reason:	Digitally signed by<br>Sukhbir Paul Kaur<br>Date: 2015.09.28<br>16:27:48 IST
	IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<br>CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
		INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 2-3 OF 2015
		IN
		CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5336-5337 OF 2015
	CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY<br>REGULATORY COMMISSION	Versus		Appellant(s)
	LAFARGE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER			Respondent(s)

O R D E R

These interlocutory applications have been filed for modification/clarification of this Court's order dated 20.7.2015.

We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the applications.

In our view, it is for the Electricity Regulatory Commission to decide the matter as per the order of remand.

It goes without saying that the Electricity Regulatory Commission may go on the merits of the case.

With the above observations, these applications are disposed of.

........................J. (M.Y. EQBAL)

.........................J. (C. NAGAPPAN)

New Delhi, September 28, 2015