Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission vs. Lafarge India Pvt Ltd

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 5336-5337/2015 CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Appellant(s) VERSUS LAFARGE INDIA PVT LTD AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for ex-parte stay and office report) Date : 20/07/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr.Adv. Mr. C. K. Rai,Adv. Mr. Paramhans, Adv. Ms. Neha, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv. Ms. Divya Chaturvedi, Adv. For M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The civil appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S. (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sukhbir Paul Kaur Date: 2015.07.21 17:25:37 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5336-5337 OF 2015 CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY Appellant(s)

Versus

LAFARGE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Respondent(s)

COMMISSION

O R D E R

We have heard senior counsel appearing for the appellant.

Having regard to the fact that the matter has been remanded back to the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short 'the Commission') to decide the question of limitation, we do not find any bar with the Commission to decide that question by applying the correct law.

Hence, with this observation, these civil appeals are disposed of.

........................J. (M.Y. EQBAL)

.........................J. (C. NAGAPPAN)

New Delhi, July 20, 2015