State Of Rajasthan vs. Shiv Shankar Gaur
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble J.B. Pardiwala, Hon'ble Manoj Misra
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [3]
Listed On:
21 Oct 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 42750/2024
COURT NO.4
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 08-05-2024 in SBCWP No. 2627/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
VERSUS
HARI SINGH
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.243583/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.243585/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
Diary No(s). $42744/2024$ (XV) (IA $\verb|No.246338/2024-CONDONATION|$ OF DELAY IN FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.246339/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 14-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Amogh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
$\mathbf{1}.\qquad$ Delay condoned.
Heard Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, learned A.A.G. appearing for the 2. petitioners.
- The counsel submits that the Division Bench of the High Court $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ <sup>1654</sup>ANS urvedic Doctors. The State's challenge to similar such orders
are pending in this Court.
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
- 4. Issue notice.
- 5. Tag with SLP (Civil) No. 9563 of 2024.
6. In the meantime, coercive steps should not be taken on account of the impugned order of the Division Bench.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR