State Of Rajasthan vs. Shiv Shankar Gaur

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:14 Nov 2024
CNR:SCIN010205442024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble J.B. Pardiwala, Hon'ble Manoj Misra

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

List After (Weeks) [3]

Listed On:

21 Oct 2024

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SECTION XV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 42750/2024

COURT NO.4

[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 08-05-2024 in SBCWP No. 2627/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur]

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

VERSUS

HARI SINGH

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.243583/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.243585/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

WITH

Diary No(s). $42744/2024$ (XV) (IA $\verb|No.246338/2024-CONDONATION|$ OF DELAY IN FILING $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.246339/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 14-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Amogh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

$\mathbf{1}.\qquad$ Delay condoned.

Heard Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, learned A.A.G. appearing for the 2. petitioners.

  1. The counsel submits that the Division Bench of the High Court $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ <sup>1654</sup>ANS urvedic Doctors. The State's challenge to similar such orders

are pending in this Court.

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

  • 4. Issue notice.
  • 5. Tag with SLP (Civil) No. 9563 of 2024.

6. In the meantime, coercive steps should not be taken on account of the impugned order of the Division Bench.

(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(25) - 20 May 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 21 Apr 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 4 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 17 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 14 Feb 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 14 Feb 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 14 Feb 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 7 Feb 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 15 Jan 2025

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 18 Dec 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 14 Nov 2024

ROP

Viewing

Order(14) - 12 Nov 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 21 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 27 Sept 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 2 Sept 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 27 Aug 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 5 Aug 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 2 Aug 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 19 Jul 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 8 Jul 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 9 May 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 3 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 10 Apr 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 15 Feb 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 12 Dec 2023

ROP

Click to view