Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
:ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal 280/2012 DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Appellant(s) VERSUS NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and substituted service and office report) Date : 21/11/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Tessy Varghese,Adv. Mr. K. V. Mohan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Uday Manaktala,Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As per certificate of service Respondent Nos. 9, 26 and 52 could not be served. Hence. learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondents and he shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to them within the same period. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 21 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the appellant within a period of four weeks, as last chance. S ervice of notice is complete on the other respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. List again on 5.01.2017 . (M V RAMESH)
Registrar
MG