The Managing Committee Of Kerala State Cooperative Agricultural And Rural Development Bank vs. Abdul Shukur Naha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [08-10-2021]
Listed On:
10 Jan 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.5 Court 16 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13891- 13895/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-06-2021 in WA No. 2491/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2525/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2534/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2538/2019 09-06-2021 in WA No. 707/2020 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ABDUL SHUKUR NAHA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.113002/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.113003/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT )
Date : 01-10-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash, AOR Ms. Divyangna Malik, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Vajpayee, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Bhati, Adv. Mr. Sumit Singh, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Dabas, Adv. Ms. Shashi Priya, Adv. Ms. Prerna Robin, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sriram P. , AOR Mr. M.S. Vishnu Shankar, Adv. Ms. Athira G Nair, Adv. Mr. Mukund P Unny, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Balan, Adv. Mr. Subhash Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Jhanvi Dubey, Adv. Ms. Jessica Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocate Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2021.10.01 18:30:42 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
There are typographical errors in record of proceedings dated 13.09.2021. The corrected record of proceedings shall be uploaded.
At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter be listed on next Friday.
It is made clear that the special leave petition will be taken up for hearing, irrespective of whether or not the special leave petition preferred by the 6th respondent is listed.
Application filed by the petitioner indicating the portions of the judgment against which they are aggrieved, if found in order would be also listed.