The Managing Committee Of Kerala State Cooperative Agricultural And Rural Development Bank vs. Abdul Shukur Naha
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
13 Sept 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.7 Court 16 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13891- 13895/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-06-2021 in WA No. 2491/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2525/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2534/2019 09-06-2021 in W.A. No. 2538/2019 09-06-2021 in WA No. 707/2020 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ABDUL SHUKUR NAHA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.113002/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.113003/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT )
Date : 13-09-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash, AOR Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Divyangna Malik, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Vajpayee, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Bhati, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kr. Dabas, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sriram P, Adv. Ms. Jessica Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Muskaan Garg, Adv.
- Ms. Shashi Priya, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
It is pointed out by Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the 6th respondent states that they are in the process of filing of a Special Digitally signed by JAGDISH KUMAR Date: 2021.09.14 10:45:01 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
leave Petition. He requests that both petitions may be taken for hearing.
In view of the request made, list after two weeks.
In the meanwhile, the petitioners are permitted to file fresh synopsis as it is stated that there is mistakes in the synopsis filed in the Special Leave Petitions. The petitioners will also file a chart indicating the portion of the judgment against which they are aggrieved.
(SONIA BHASIN) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER(NSH)