Tumukuru Jilla Hemavathy Nala A. Vedike vs. The State Of Karnataka State Of Karnataka . Through Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ê ORIGINAL SUIT 3 OF 2002 ITEM No.9 and Court No. 1 SECTION IIIA ITEM No.57 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 2 in I.A. No. 1 in ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2002 STATE OF TAMIL NADU Plaintiff (s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Defendant (s) (for directions) (with office report) and Item No. 57@@ CCCCCCCCCCC Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 461/2002 in I.A. No. 1 in Original Suit No. 3/2002 (State of Tamil Nadu vs. S M Krishna & Ors.) Date : 23/09/2002 These Petitions was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. BALAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT For Plaintiff (s)/ Applicant (s)/ Petitioner (s) State of Tamil Nadu Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Muthukumaraswamy, Addl. Adv. Genl. Mr. G. Umapathy, Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam, Adv. Mr. Vadivelu, Adv. Ms. Revathy Raghavan, Adv. For Defendant (s)/ Respondent (s) State of Karnataka Mr. Anil B. Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv. Mr. A N Jayaram, Adv. Genl., Karnataka. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Shambhu Prasad Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra, Adv. UoI Mr. Harish N. Salve, SG Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. S.N. Terdol, Adv. State of Kerala Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Adv. Govt. of Pondicherry Mr. P K Manohar, Adv. Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv. Ms. Shanti Vasudevan, Adv.
For intervenor Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. N. Ganapathy, Adv. Mandya Farmers Assn. Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. (intervenor) Mr. Brijesh Kalappa, Adv. Mr. N Ganapathy, Adv. For Karnataka Cauvery Basin Farmers' Action Committee Mr. K.R. Nagaraja, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R ........L.......I........T........T.......T.......T.......T.......J .SP2 Applications for intervention/impleadment are dismissed. After perusing the affidavit of the Union of India, we deem it proper to issue notice in the Contempt Petition No. 461/2002 returnable on 30th September, 2002. Dasti service in addition is permitted. Personal presence of the
: 2 :
In the meantime, the Union of India shall file a further affidavit indicating the extent of inflow into the Mettur Dam, on or before 27th September, 2002, in order to ascertain whether the direction of the Cauvery River Authority and this Court has been complied with or not.
List on 30th September, 2002.
alleged contemnors is dispensed with for the present.
.SP1
Kalyani. (S.L. GOYAL)@@ AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA COURT MASTER @@ A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA