Tumukuru Jilla Hemavathy Nala A. Vedike vs. The State Of Karnataka State Of Karnataka . Through Chief Secretary

\222 1

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IA 2 in I.A.1 in ORIGINAL SUIT No.3/2002

STATE OF TAMIL NADU Plaintiff(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Defendant(s) (With appln(s) for directions and office report )

WITH CONT.PET.(C)NO.461/2002 IN I.A.1 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.3/2002

WITH CONT.PET.(C)NO.484/2002 IN I.A.2 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.3/2002 (With appln.(s) for extension of time and office report)

WITH W.P.(C)NO.581/2002 (With appln.(s) for ex-parte stay and office report)

Date: 28/11/2008 These applns./Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL

For Plaintiff(s) Mr.G.Umapathy, Adv. Mr.R.Nedumaran, Adv.

Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.

2

Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv.

For Defendant(s) Mr.F.S.Nariman, Sr.Adv. Mr.Mohan V.Katarki, Adv. Mr.S.P.SIngh, Adv. Mr.Ranvir Singh, Adv. Mr.S.C.Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Adv. Mr.A.ROhen Singh, Adv. Mr.Amit Kr.Chawla, Adv.

Mr. G. Prakash ,Adv

Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal ,Adv

Mr.A.S.Nambiar, Sr.Adv. Mr.P.K.Manohar, Adv. Mrs.Shanta Vasudevan,Adv. Mr. V.G. Pragasam ,Adv Mr.S.J.Aristotle, Adv. Mr.Prabhu Ramasubramanian, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

CONT.PET.(C)No.461/2002 & 484/2002:

The first respondent in both these petitions has filed a statement explaining the

circumstances and so we do not think that any contempt has been made out. The contempt

3

petitions are accordingly disposed of.

I.A.No.2 is also disposed of accordingly.

Post the main matter for preliminary steps on 28.01.2009 with the writ petition.

Liberty to mention.

(G.V.Ramana) (Veera Verma) Court Master Court Master