State Of M. P. vs. Janak Kumar Jain

ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20288/2012 STATE OF M.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MASOOD AKHTAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 20907 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 21188 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 21225 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 21675 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 28/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. B.S. Banthia,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Niraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondents, who are duly represented through their learned Advocates, in this batch of matters, have already filed counter affidavit on record. Item No.34 -2- The remaining duly represented respondents are granted three weeks' time, as a final chance, for filing counter affidavit. As per the office report, the remaining respondents are reported to be duly and properly served through dasti but none appeared. List again on 1.3.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |

rd

j