S. K. Sharma vs. The State Of Telangana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed [rejected]
Listed On:
18 Oct 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
100816/2022,100818/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.1 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 6756/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-06-2022 in CRLP No. 4313/2022 passed by the High Court For The State Of Telangana At Hyderabad)
S. K. SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 100818/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ; IA No. 100816/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 18-10-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Basant R. (Sr. Adv.)<br>Mr. Pawan Reley, Adv.<br>Mr. Vishnu Pazhanganat, Adv.<br>Mr. Akshay Lodhi, Adv.<br>Mr. Ankit Chaudhary, Adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.<br>Ms. Reena Devi, Adv.<br>Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Vinod Sharma, AOR |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv.<br>Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR<br>Ms. Sweena Nair, Adv.<br>Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv.<br>Mr. M. Chandrakanth Reddy, Adv.<br>Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR<br>Mr. Ayush Anand, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr. R. Basant, learned Senior Advocate in support of the petition and Ms. Sweena Nair, learned Advocate appearing for the State.
Considering the stage of the present matter, we see no reason to interfere in our jurisdiction under Article 136(1) of the Constitution of India.
The Special Leave Petition is therefore dismissed leaving all questions open to be agitated at the appropriate stage in the proceedings. The dismissal of the petition shall not taken to be reflection on the merits of the matter.
In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we also permit the petitioners to present their submissions in support of application for discharge through their lawyer(s).
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(INDU MARWAH) (VIRENDER SINGH)
COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
2