Reliance Communications Ltd vs. Mtnl

¦ ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 22764/2014 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and office report) Date : 14/08/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG Mr. Ravi Sikri, Adv. Mr. D. Yadav, Adv. for Ms. N. Annapoorani,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Paras Kuhad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Sachin, Adv. for Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant seeks one week's time

to enable him to file an affidavit, indicating the inability of the appellant to determine call details, flowing out of their own CDR's. Liberty is also granted to the appellant to place on record material to show, that the respondent was hiding the caller-line-identity. Reply affidavit, if any, by the respondent be filed within one week thereafter. List after two Signature Not Verified weeks. Digitally signed by Parveen Kumar Chawla Date: 2014.08.19 17:19:22 IST

(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora)

Reason:

Court Master Assistant Registrar