Rahima Khatun vs. Union Of India

êSLP CC 24571-72/16 1 ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC 24571-24572/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/06/2016 in RP No. 42/2016 08/12/2015 in WPC No. 6591/2015 16/06/2016 in WPC No. 6591/2015 passed by the High Court of Gauhati) NAFIZ KURESHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 03/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that Md. Aniz Kureshi, who was the opposite party in F.T.(D.C.) Case No.450/09, the brother of the present petitioner, has been treated as an Indian under the Foreigners Act, 1964. Though such a fact was brought to the notice of the High Court in the review petition, yet it has declined to address the issue on the ground that a new case sought to be projected by the petitioner. SLP CC 24571-72/16 2 Taking into consideration the stand that the brother of the petitioner has been declared as an Indian, we are inclined to direct issuance of notice, fixing a returnable date within three weeks hence. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Let the matter be listed on 13 th February, 2017. (Chetan Kumar) Court Master (H.S. Parasher) Court Master