Union Of India vs. L. Joy

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:18 Apr 2022
CNR:SCIN010201992020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Listed On:

18 Apr 2022

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19850/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GOPAL KRISHNA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 14482/2021 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.96926/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date : 18-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Amrish Kumar,Adv.<br>Ms. Priyanka,Adv.<br>Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R, AOR
Mr. Rahat,Adv.
Mr. Nikhil Chand,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 19850/2019

Service of notice is complete on respondent No. 2 but none has entered appearance on his behalf. Signature Not Verified

As per postal tracking report notice issued to respondent Nos. 1 and 3 has been received back with postal remarks "Addressee left". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of two weeks file the fresh particulars of the said Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2022.04.19 15:15:13 IST Reason:

respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to them within the same period.

Ms. Priyanaka, Ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of Mr. Amrish Kumar, Ld. Advocate-on-Record submits that there is change of Advocate-on-Record for petitioners. She seeks and is given two weeks time for filing fresh vakalatnama and "NOC" from erstwhile Advocate.

SLP(C) No. 14482/2021

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 5, 6 and 8 but none has entered appearance on their behalf.

Service is not complete in respect of Respondent No.7.

At this stage Mr.Rahat Bansal, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., Ld. Advocate-on-Record and submitted that yesterday evening he has e-filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 6 to 8. He seeks and is given four weeks to file the counter affidavit.

Four weeks time is given to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to file the counter affidavit.

List again on 18.07.2022.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar

MG

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 21 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 18 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 18 Apr 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 13 Sept 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 20 Nov 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 16 Aug 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view