The State Of Rajasthan The State Of Rajasthan Principal Secretary vs. Sharwan Kumar Kumawat
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [31-01-2019]
Listed On:
30 Nov 2018
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 1162-1171/2016
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
SHARWAN KUMAR KUMAWAT Respondent(s)
(I.A. 108600/2018- condonation of delay in filing the appln. for recalling the Court's order and I.A 48567/2018- Recalling court's order in CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1172-1176, 1177-1181, 1202-1206, 1207- 1211 OF 2016)
Date : 13-08-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL [IN CHAMBER]
For Appellant(s) Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR Mr. Anuj Bhandari, AOR Ms. Arti Gupta, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay in filing application for restoration is condoned.
Application for restoration is allowed in terms of signed order.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed order is placed on the file) Digitally signed by RAJNI MUKHI Date: 2018.08.16 16:59:26 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
I.A. NO. 48567 OF 2018 (Application for recalling the orders dated 4.12.2017 26.03.2018)
AND
I.A. NO. 108600/2018
(Application for condonation of delay in filing recalling application)
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1172-1176, 1177-1181, 1202-1206, 1207- 1211 OF 2016
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. ....APPELLANTS
VERSUS
SHARWAN KUMAR KUMAWAT, ETC. ETC. .....RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
Delay in filing application for recalling the orders dated 04.12.2017 & 26.03.2018 is condoned.
Application for recalling the orders dated 4.12.2017 and 26.03.2018 passed by Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, is allowed in terms below.
One more opportunity is granted to the learned counsel for the appellants to serve the unserved respondents within four weeks failing which the earlier orders would continue to operate.
....................J. (SANJAY KISHAN KAUL)
NEW DELHI, AUGUST 13, 2018