Mohd. Aslam vs. The State Of Uttarakhand
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Vacation Matter
Before:
Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
20 May 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.33
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 7006/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-01-2024 in C482 No. 2435/2023 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital)
MOHD. ASLAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.117452/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 20-05-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL (Vacation Bench)
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Sr. Adv.<br>Ms. Shaifali Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Himanshu Pal Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Akash, Adv.<br>Mr. Anurag Pandey, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashish Pandey, AOR<br>Ms. Chanchal, Adv. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ear Deconnant(c) |
For $respondent(s)$
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 1.
$\mathbf{2}$ . We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
$\mathbf{L}^{\mathbf{A}}$ $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} \text{CUM} - \text{PS}$
(NIDHI WASON) COURT MASTER (NSH)
SECTION II-B
COURT NO.3
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)