Satish Kumar vs. State Nct Of Delhi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble K.M. Joseph
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
29 Jul 2019
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.41
COURT NO.13
SECTION II-C
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5475/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-03-2018 in BA No. 482/2018 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)
SATISH KUMAR
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Date: 29-07-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anurag, AOR Lokesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Ms. Madhvi Divan, ASG Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Mr. Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Maini, Adv. Mr. Suhael Buttan, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR Mr. Anupam Lal das, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dipesh Sinha , AOR Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv.
- Mr. Krishanu Barua, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 confirms that closure Perforce port has been filed.
However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on a protest petition filed by him, the trial Court has directed further
investigation in terms of the order dated 27.07.2019.
We are of the view that all those aspects require to be considered by the trial Court as the only question before us is whether an anticipatory bail ought to have been granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3 by the High Court.
It is not in dispute that respondent Nos.2 and 3 as accused have joined the investigation. Whatever data was required has been submitted.
If any further material is required by the prosecution, respondent Nos.2 and 3 would be bound to supply the same and join further investigation as and when called for.
The aforesaid would sub-serve the purpose. Therefore, no further orders are called for in this petition. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (ANITA RANI AHUJA)