Pardeep vs. The State Of Haryana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Hima Kohli
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
27 Sept 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14 <pre>Court 1 (Video Conferencing)</pre> SECTION II-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6758/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-08-2021 in CRMM No.31159/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
PARDEEP
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.112096/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.112095/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.112094/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 27-09-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meena Chaudhary Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Mendiratta, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order whereby the High Court dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail preferred by the petitioner herein.
The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
sequel to the above, pending interlocutory $\mathsf{As}$ $\mathbf{a}$ Atications also stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
(R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (NSH)