James vs. State Through The Inspector Of Police

ITEM NO.16

COURT NO.17

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.11663-11664/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-03-2022 in CRLRC(MD) Nos. 932/2021 and 16/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Madras at Madurai)

JAMES

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondent $(s)$ (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No. 167039/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT <pre>IA No. 167041/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)</pre> Date: 03-03-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR Mr. Ashish Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Y. Lokesh, Adv. Mr. V. Sibi Karqil, Adv. Ms. Maitri Goal, Adv. Mr. Surya Narayana Patro, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Chowdhary, Adv. Ms. Yakeen Bishoyi, Adv. Mr. V. Kandha Prabhu, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR Ms. Priyaranjani Nagamuthu, Adv. Mr. A.S.Vairawan, Adv. Mr. R. Sudhakaran, Adv. Ms. Shalini Mishra, Adv. Mr. T. Hari Hara Sudhan, Adv. Mr. G. Vikas, Adv. Mr. Duvvuri Subrahmanya Bhanu, Adv. Mr. K.Deivendran, Adv.

• Mr. D. Alagendren, Adv.
• Ms. Subasri Jaganathan, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, prima facie, we find that no case for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India is made out. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions from the petitioner whether the petitioner will be in a position to pay the entire amount due and payable to all the concerned persons as shown in the Chart annexed to the petition, with a reasonable rate of interest.

List on 20th March, 2023.

(ANITA MALHOTRA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER