Achintya Mukherjee& Ors. vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Ors Ministry Of Urban Developmen Through Its Secretary

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10699 of 2011

ACHINTYA MUKHERJEE AND ORS.

$APPELLANT(S)$

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

$RESPONDENT(S)$

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks discharge in view of the fact that a letter has been sent on behalf of the appellants seeking to change their counsel. The request is acceded to.

The appellants have not made any alternative arrangements after having taken a decision to discharge the counsel.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for nonprosecution.

$\ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots\mathbf{J}$ (SANJAY KISHAN KAUL)

$\ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots$ (K.M.JOSEPH)

ITEM NO.112 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s).10699/2011

ACHINTYA MUKHERJEE AND ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Respondent(s)

Date : 12-12-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH

For Appellant(s) Mr. Anip Sachthey,AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. P. N. Puri,AOR Ms. Meera Mathur,AOR Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Chirag M.Shroff,AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution in terms of the signed order.

(B.PARVATHI) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

(Signed order is placed on the file)