Sneh Lata vs. The State Of Haryana And Ors. Haryana Civil Secreatriat Managing Director
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
25 Jul 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4432-4433/2016
TIGHTWELL FASTNERS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 04/05/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
With
SLP(C) No. 4438-4439/2016 | |
---|---|
SLP(C) No. 1856/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 4440-4451/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 4452-4463/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 4410-4421/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 26635-26636/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 8122/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 6198/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 26637/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 27973-27974/2016 | |
SLP(C) No. 10397/2017 | |
(With Office Report) |
Date : 04/05/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv.
Mr. P. K. Manohar,Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. Mr. Vinay Garg,Adv. Mr.V.S.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Navneet Chaudhary,Adv. Mr.Ravinder Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma,Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Ms. M. Sarada,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr.Ajay Jain,Adv. Mr. Jinendra Jain,Adv.
Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv.
…..........2
For Respondent(s)
Mr.Ajay Marwah,Adv. Mr.Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Adv. Mr.Angad Mehta,Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No.26637/2016
Await the return of service of notice already issued to the respondent Nos.1-13.
The respondent Nos.14-222 have been deleted by order dated 5.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No.8122/2016
Service is complete on the respondent Nos.1-11 & 13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
As per postal tracking report in respect of the respondent No.12 the remarks shows that "insufficient address". Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
The respondent Nos.14-232 have been deleted by order dated 5.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No.27973-74/2016
The respondent Nos.3-224 have been deleted by order dated 14.09.2016 of the Hon'ble Court.
Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the other unserved respondents within two weeks.
….3
SLP(C) Nos.10397/2017
Service is complete on the respondent Nos.1-9, 11,12 & 13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
As per postal tracking report in respect of the respondent No.10 the remarks shows that "door locked". Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
The respondent Nos.14-234 have been deleted by order dated 03.04.2017 of the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No.4432-33, 4438-39 & 1856/2016
The respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
SLP(C) No.4440-51 & 4452-63/2016
In respect of the respondent No.6 in SLP(C) No.4452-63/2016, Ld.coundel for the petitioner to serve the counsel appearing for him in the connected matter and file proof. Registry to issue dasti notice to this effect.
SLP(C) Nos.4444-45/16, 4456-57/2016
In respect of the respondent No.10 in SLP(C) No.4444-45/2016, Ld.coundel for the petitioner to serve the counsel appearing for him in the connected matter and file proof. Registry to issue dasti notice to this effect.
SLP(C) Nos.4462-63/2016
Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed the requisites in respect of the respondent Nos.6-8 after the period prescribed for such filing. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld.counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned, and, accordingly, notice shall be issued to the above respondents with utmost dispatch.
SLP(C) Nos.4410-11/2016
As per Trial Court report the respondent No.6 has left the house.
….....4
Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
SLP(C) Nos.4414-15/2016
Service is complete on the respondent No.9, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.
As per Trial Court report, the respondent No.10 has refused to accept the notice. This refusal on his part constitutes proper service, but no one has entered appearance.
SLP(C) Nos.4416-17/2016
As per Trial Court report the respondent No.15 has left the address. Hence, Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
SLP(C) No.6198/2016
The respondent Nos.1 & 2 have failed to file the counter affidavit.
Service is complete on the respondent Nos.3-13, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
The respondent Nos.14-230 have been deleted by order dated 14.03.2016 of the Hon'ble Court. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
SLP(C) No.26635-36/2016
File not received.
List incomplete matters on 3.08.2017.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
SB